Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: Dunder Dome

ANO

There are two videos that are required viewing - out of many - but, these two should suffice. One video is located here and the other is located here. In the first video, Madeline Albright makes a fairly bizarre statement and in the second video, she tells the world how Saddam must be removed from his regime. The second video is a compilation which we have all heard and seen before but, in order to understand what she has said in recent times, both videos must be viewed.

Before reading on, please view the videos at the links provided and then come back. Thanks.

I sit back and often wonder why it is that certain members of the Leftinistra jump up and down with glee when "bad things" happen or take place in Iraq. I cannot help but recall several posts I penned in the past where I verbalized sentiments that at times, one cannot differentiate the verbiage between the enemies we face "over there" and our own Leftinistra "over here". Many times I have made reference to this and have stirred the pot, as it were. Be that as it may, now we have the former SecState under William Jefferson Clinton's Presidency once again yammering and lying her inflated rump off:

[...] "Iraq is going to go down in history as the greatest disaster in American foreign policy. Now, that's quite a statement, because it means I think it is worst than Vietnam. Not in the number of Americans who died, or Vietnamese versus Iraqis, but in terms of those unintended consequences. And the biggest unintended consequence in Iraq is Iran. I think one might say that actually Iran has actually won the war in Iraq." [...]

As a theoretically "higher educated" individual, one would hope that she would have more sense than to make such a fool of herself in the publics' eye. Apparently, she, as well as many others, has forgotten that because of President Jimmy Carter, there has been a "state of war" between the United States and Iran since 1979. The unintended consequence, in my opinion, is no one really counted on the socialist democrats to actually aid and abet the enemy as much and as deeply as they have been doing since the war in Iraq started and quite possibly the war in Afghanistan.

Following closely to the Party Line of the Socialist Democrats she so holds near and dear to her heart of stone, she blames America and our troops. This. Is. Unacceptable. Every time such a fool opens their horrid lips and utters such blatant stupidity and vile ignorance, the enemy rejoices and is enabled and stoked.

I would like to know how many of the war dead and war wounded are directly caused by such shameful public discourses wrought upon our country by those that pretend to love this country.

Jake Tapper has a good point and it leads to more questions:

Albright could not be immediately reached for comment on why she's supporting the Democratic presidential candidate who voted for "the greatest disaster in American foreign policy" over one who opposed it.

Yes. We call this using the American Military as a political football to distract from the issues at hand - are we going to select known socialists as President? If we do, I'll not recognize their authority in anything.

Gateway Pundit has a few choice comments on this issue:

[...] In her latest attack on the United States, the military and President Bush, Madeleine Albright blamed the US for creating more terrorists and said that our soldiers were the problem in Iraq. In the video at the link Albright says that the US needs to fight the War on Terror without creating more terrorists...Because it is our fault that the terrorists hate us, you know. [...]

That one...again? I am beginning to agree with Gateway. I have heard him say this before but kind of ignored it until now. Maybe Bill Clinton wasn't all that bad on his own seeing that idiots like Albright were actually counseling him. Kind of scary. After all, one of his other "advisers" Joycelyn Elders said we should have safer bullets. Oy!

What would this highly educated moron say to this:

[...] Today she insists that Iraqis who are not Baathist hope that McCain wins the election for one simple reason: "The man knows the job that has to be done in Iraq. If the U.S. pulls out of Iraq now or anytime soon, then that will mean one thing: al-Qaeda won the war."

She points out that for the first time since Iraq's monarchy was toppled in 1958, the country has a parliament, a free press, jobs, a true identity "and a better understanding toward where the country should be heading."

The sectarian divide, meanwhile, is an artificial schism created by al-Qaeda and other non-Iraqis, she says. Many Iraqis are like Mayada, a Sunni, who have married across sectarian lines.

Says Mayada: "When you ask the young people of Iraq - what are you, a Sunni or a Shiite? - the ready answer is: I am an Iraqi." [...]

Now we know. The Leftinistra want to lose this war because Identity Politics in Iraq is dying. The Iraqi people want to live as Iraqis and not secular and tribal garbage that Saddam forced them into. Then again, flip-flop politics is all the fools know.

Vote it up at Real Clear Politics...