Moosetwit I

WP, TH, ANO

I will try to analyze the interview of General William Odom by Hugh Hewitt. More than likely, I will stroke out either by pure laughter of disgust or sheer awe of how incredulous this guy really is. Here goes. The transcript in its entirety is located here:

Townhall

HH: Welcoming now to the Hugh Hewitt Show General William Odom. General, a real pleasure to make your acquaintance. Thanks for being on the program, thanks for your service.

WO: Thank you for the opportunity to be on your program.

HH: Now I read with great interest your piece in Sunday’s Washington Post on February 11th, Victory Is Not An Option, and a piece very similar to it from 2005, General, and I’d like you to explain to the audience who haven’t had a chance to read it what you think America should do in Iraq right now.

WO: Well, we can’t do much of anything that’s useful for ourselves until we begin to withdraw.

STOP THE PRESS RIGHT THERE!!!! This is what happens when the individual has become more educated than its brain can absorb and the neurons go on vacation. We can’t do much of anything that’s useful until we withdraw? What a Moosetwit!! (twits are parasites that “hang out” around the bung holes of forest critters) Withdraw to where? Withdraw AWAY from the enemy? Isn’t that like, retreat when we are NOW winning? These jerks REALLY don’t pay attention, do they? My emails are telling me that the surge that scares the HELL out of the defeatocrats is WORKING already! Judas Priest these people get my warrior’s blood boiling!! Withdraw. Moron.

“We are diplomatically and strategically paralyzed in Iraq.” WOE THERE NELLY BELLY!! Strategically paralyzed? I thought this guy was a General. General of what? Latrine Force? He obviously knows NOTHING of Strategy vs Tactics. Hey. I was/am just a grunt but in grunt school they taught us the differences. The strategy is to WIN. HOW to win is dealt with in TACTICS. For MONTHS “they” were whining about needing a change in TACTICS. They have CHANGED and for the better and it is about time, I might add. What a moosetwit.

“As we begin to move out, countries who are not very cooperative with us, or wish us evil, are going to be worried about the aftermath.” I AM DECLARING THE ACTIVATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY MORON ALERT SERVICE ON THAT ONE. We are fighting the ones that “WISH US EVIL”. Move away from them and they will get concerned? That is what they want us to do…move away from them because they CANNOT defeat us militarily. He needs to turn in his General Stars for a yoyo.

“We cannot stabilize the whole region by ourselves.” HOLD THE PHONE!! We can IF we have the will to do so and the SURGE is just that. There were not enough troops to hold the territories we cleared and then to hold it. We swept in, cleared the areas out and then moved on, leaving a vacuum for the enemy to refill. That was just a plain dumb tactic. Moosetwit.

“We’re going to need really important allies, not just our allies that we’ve bought to come in there with us for the invasion. And we’re going to need them both on the borders of Iraq, and we’re going to need Europeans, Indians, Chinese, Japanese and others to help us.” HEY MOOSETWIT! We already have countries to help us. They aren’t “important” enough for this moosetwit? Europeans? Like France? LOL!! France. Moosetwit. The Chinese? HELLO? The Indians? HELLO? This guy’s crack pipe must have something else in it. Perhaps moosetwit droppings.

Simply amazing. Unbelievable. I am thankful to Hugh for allowing this moosetwit to string out the rope required to hang himself with it.

Moosetwit.

Moosetwit II

WP, TH, ANO

This is a continuation from Moosetwit Part I. FYI, a twit is a parasite that hangs out on the bung holes of forest creatures, primarily large ones.

HH: How quickly do you want us…

Just like a good lib fruitloop to interupt, ain’t it?

WO: They will, I think, begin to respond to us once we get out.

There he goes thinking without a license. The “they” this mutant is refering to are the countries that will “become concerned” when we bug out. What interests me is that he refers to the countries that “wish to do us harm” will begin to become concerned when we bug out. How and why and about what? Also, he says that “he thinks” this may happen. I thought they wanted absolutes. Excuse me but, does “They will, I think” sound absolute to you? Is this a gamble on this lib’s part? And what would “those that wish us harm” become concerned about? As for responding to us “once we get out”, is this a good thing? I think not. And, when he refers to countries that are not helping us now, who gives a damn but some left-wing fruitloop that live their lives hoping everyone is happy with their actions? Such moosetwits. One can surmise that the responses we are getting from countries that wish to do us harm are unacceptable to the lefties. Why? Oh. Wait. They are unhappy. I get it now. Perhaps if they were dancing in the streets because we bugged out making them happy is more acceptable. Moosetwits.

“They will not as long as we’re still there.” Another poli-speak malcontent. This guy is really a moosetwit. The lefties want the terrorists to be happy and nothing will make them happier than for the US to bug out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Jerk. He is another one that doesn’t get the Big Picture.

HH: How long do you want us to take to get out, General?

The idjit let Hugh finish the question.

WO: Well, to me, that would be an issue that would have to be resolved with the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the Commander out there.HOLY COW!!!! As long as the SecDef, Joint Chiefs and the Commander “out there” agree with the bug out, the planned bug out would be acceptable! BUT! But if they DON’T agree with the bug out, the plan to WIN is unacceptable. I see. Moosetwit.

“But if we could do it in six months, I’d like to do it. If it takes nine, fine. I would not complain if we did it in four.”

These moosetwits just don’t pay attention to anything but that which is between their own clogged nasal passages. President Bush in the last SOTU stated that the Iraqi government has until NOVEMBER 2007 to get their act together! Hello? Oh. Wait. That isn’t in 4 months He said “if it takes nine, fine”. Jerk. I guess 10 months is 1 month too long. What a moosetwit.

HH: Now let’s talk a little bit about two of the key points that really intrigued me, and I disagree with them, General, but I want to hear you out on them. The first is that the Arab and Muslim political cultures just aren’t ready for democracy. Can you expand on that for the audience?

Pay attention here.

WO: Well, they’re ready for democracy. They’re not ready for constitutional orders.

They are ready for democracy but not constitutional orders. WHO is the THEY this moosetwit is referring to? The countries NOT helping us, the countries that WISH TO DO US HARM, or the people of Iraq that VOTED FOR THEIR NEW CONSTITUTION? HELLO???

HH: Okay, and can you expand on that please?

This question was a subliminal one in that what was really asked was, “Can you tell us what a liberal fool you and your kind are, please? Just to make sure. Thank you.”

WO: Yes, there are only about 24, 25, 26 countries in the world of 191 members at the United Nations that have truly liberal democracies. There are lots of democracies, but they’re illiberal, meaning that they have various levels of tyranny. Rights are not secure, Russia has elections, India has elections, it has a great reputation as a democracy, but your property rights are not stable at the lower, at the village level. A mother-in-law can throw acid in the face of a daughter-in-law and not be taken to the court. There are lots of illiberal things about it. Now those countries are all in the Western political tradition, with a very few exceptions. Japan and I would include South Korea and Taiwan now. The rule on political scientists is their constitutional order generally sticks if it lasts for a generation, about 20 years or more. So the countries I count are ones that have had stable, liberal orders for more than a generation.

WOW!!! Quite a mouthful and IF the sentence structure is blurted out, it sounds like he ellaborated. However, if one were to take a sentence at a time, one will see that this moosetwit is merely aping a socialists’ ignorance and is a rambler of socialist talking points…I mean liberal talking points. Same thing? Yes.

Odom said that out of the 191 members of the United Nations maybe there are a max of 26 TRULY LIBERAL democracies. Is this a clue?

Liberal democracy is a form of representative democracy where elected representatives that hold the decision power are moderated by a constitution that emphasizes protecting individual liberties and the rights of minorities in society, such as freedom of speech and assembly, freedom of religion, the right to private property and privacy, as well as equality before the law and due process under the rule of law.

By this definition, is the United States a liberal democracy or a tyrannical democracy? When our property rights can be swept under the rug all in the name of more tax collections, is this a good thing? Is this a liberal democracy thing or a tyrannical democracy thing? What is this moosetwit yaking about?

He said, “Japan and I…” WHAT? Japan Odom runs things now? I call MOOSETWIT!!

He said, “The rule on political scientists is their constitutional order generally sticks if it lasts for a generation, about 20 years or more. So the countries I count are ones that have had stable, liberal orders for more than a generation.”

Again, I call MOOSETWIT!!!! I also have initiated the NATIONAL EMERGENCY MORON ALERT SERVICE!! This idjit and others like him haven’t given Iraq’s “democracy” but 2 or 3 years to flourish. He said 20+ years determines a democracy. HELLO? And it WON’T flourish until we WIN the war against the terrorists INTERNAL of Iraq. The countries that wish to do us harm, as Odom has stated, HATE democracy and this idjit wants us to withdraw and let the new-found democracy of Iraq that the people of Iraq voted for fend for themselves.

This guy is a moosetwit.