Why are the successes in Iraq not news worthy? Could it be that the Good News in the GWOT does not suit the Socialist Liberal agenda? Could it be that the Liberal run and operated MSM (so called) has been TOLD not to run the Good News on the WOT?
Why do the Murthas, et al, seem so bent and determined to see to it that the GWOT is lost?
So many questions and so few answers. I have some funds set aside to one day take out a full-page “ad” in one of the MSM (so called) rag with a list of questions for the libs. Please feel free to present your own questions. Who knows? Maybe one day we will see them in the centerfold of an MSM (so called) rag.
“…The two week old “Battle of Baghdad” has forced Sunni and Shia gangs to stay in hiding. That has helped the terror bombing operations, as these depend on stealth and surprise…”THAT isn’t news worthy?
“…However, recent attacks appear to be of the “use it or lose it” variety…”That isn’t news worthy either?
“…The more intense security operations inside Baghdad have uncovered bomb workshops and safe houses, meaning that more bombers will have to come in from the suburbs. But the suburbs are under attack as well…”My, my!! Certainly this cannot possibly be news worthy. Nah. Not at all. (sarcasm intended for you liberal moonbats)
“…The failed attack at Tarmiya does nothing for terrorist morale. ..”That one right there does a warrior good but angers and outrages the socialist liberal. Good News in the GWOT does not mesh very well with the socialist liberal’s numb cranial cavities.
“…While most of the Battle for Baghdad has concentrated on Sunni terrorists, American and Iraqi troops were also seen surrounding and taking over the headquarters of Muqtada Al Sadr, the head of the Mahdi army (a coalition of pro-Iran Shia militias). Sadar, and most of his henchmen, have fled to Iran, until the Battle for Baghdad is over…”Holy Shiite Raghead!!!!! Why did these brave Jihadist souls RUN AWAY? Are they also socialist liberals as well? Don’t socialist liberals run away and feign anger and outrage when shown they are defeatist dweebs? LOL!! No wonder this isn’t news worthy to the MSM (so called)! Cowards all. Pacifistic Coward Command…the democratic party.
“…Despite the jump in terrorist bombings in the last few days, the death toll in Baghdad, since the security operations began two weeks ago, have declined by over 70 percent…”HOLD THE PRESSES!!!! DOWN by 70%? WHAT? This is not news worthy? What a bunch of LOSERS!!! Good God Almighty! What has this country become when GOOD news is not printed? I guess it alldepends on what YOUR definition of GOOD NEWS is. Ring a bell? “That depends on what your definition of IS is.” Please.
“…Shia civilians were afraid that, with Shia militiamen off the streets, there would be more attacks by Sunni death squads. This didn’t happen, mainly because Sunni civilians, who provided safe houses for Sunni terrorists, have been driven from Shia neighborhoods…”
More non-news worthy items, eh? Makes me sick.
Last excerpt…read the whole article for the FULL affect.
“…Occasionally, these arrests will result in some gun fire, and that might be noisy enough to make the news. But, generally, the most important stuff is not considered dramatic enough for a headline…”And there you have it. The key to the whole issue of what is news worthy and that which is not…SENSATIONALISM. Back in the old days, that was called Yellow Journalism and the “good” journalists considered that taboo.
Labels: GWOT, Lame Stream Media, Surge, War In Iraq
|